Link to video of the reading of "Trouble in Mind" at Bookshop Santa Cruz on May 8, 2012.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y693tTrBGJg&feature=youtu.be
A loose set of blogbooks, each a series of considerations on poetry and poetics, working progressively past the concerns of the Language and post-Language poets and their devolution into aestheticisms. "Post-language" in its engagement with the extra-linguistic concerns of both Tibetan and Euro-American philosophies, it also simply posts language to work toward the form of a practice of anti-aesthetics as an answer to contemporary poetic and political theory. It is an exercise book.
Tuesday, May 22, 2012
Saturday, May 19, 2012
Rob Wilson's phone-vid of one poem from my reading at UCSC
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=3994065769566
Here we are human-miking "Trouble in Mind #3--Newspeak (for our times)."
Here we are human-miking "Trouble in Mind #3--Newspeak (for our times)."
Monday, May 14, 2012
"Get the Picture" #2
AWAKE
(for
sleep)
Night stays awake in the light
remembrance dreams place
behind the mind’s eye
so doing calls up that state
and experience answers
with having been elsewhere
in the dark imagining sleep makes
you
carry bodily thru the day.Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Bigger Picture
This sense of the always already
bigger picture is where the poems come from and should be in them from the
get-go. It is an attempt to take the unthinking commodification common to
today’s realpolitik and turn it back
upon itself. There is a pari mutuel
here, a risk between us that the reader will always be tempted to simply take
the pictures as illustrations. The risk is allowed, though, in order to move us
toward the chance of an open dimension that should come from the way that the pictures
are chosen to tangentially bounce off something in the poem and from how they
always already implicate something more from the bigger picture of our lives.
In
the borrowed picture that is part of the poem “Space (for Tenzin Gyatso),” we
have a relatively simple image that can be discussed fruitfully along these
lines. It is a highway sign with a schematic image of a sitting meditator on
it. If you get those things, and that is not a totally given thing with today’s
audiences, but if you do—then, there are those to things to bounce off of the
poem together. I hope the poem in itself presents the concept of the “space” to
be put into experience and thought by the praxis of shamatha/vipassana/zazen
meditation. If we read the picture, we get something like we would get from the
familiar orange diamond-shaped one with a curving arrow that tells us “Curve
Ahead” without using words. “Meditation Ahead” might be what it says, then, or
“Look Out: Meditator Ahead” maybe.
So,
why not just deliver it in words? If this is what it says in words, why not
just say it? Arnheim’s famous old book on Visual Thinking gives scientific philosophical answers as to why
not: he puts the reasons into terms of the spatial relations delivered in the
visual. Reasons also could be given in terms of social relations presented by
iconic visuals. That approach could also encompass Aristotle’s two other
appeals to the audience: emotional and ethical “reasons.” These are not so
easily put into language because of the sentimentalities and other reductive
forces at work when one words them. It is the iconic quality of visuals that
goes beyond Arnheim and works compactly from and with and on the social in a
fashion that we feel and can feel in our ethical gut as critical.
At
the risk of belaboring explanation yet further, something I used to hate seeing
done to a poem by my professors, I’ll go on here with the picture in “Space.”
It speaks in the idiom of driving. What’s important about that is the way that
the domain of driving reflects many of the urges of our current social
relations: speed, teleological efficiency, management (to drive in Spanish is manejar), and numerical applications with separation into
units. You may notice that these all also apply to the factory. To confront
them in their own idiom with something that “speaks” too of meditation praxis
is to also say “slow down” and, perhaps, “turn in a fresh direction” or even,
jokingly, “watch out for spacey people messing with this system.” Whatever we
feel about this, we may also feel in our gut that it might be a good thing to
mess in this way. That’s the joke and the brilliance of this little piece of
art that I borrowed from the internet (where I found it with no originator
named).
In
our society of commodified thoughts, thoughts are packaged for us iconically
all the time. This one enters an established domain and messes with it
(“occupies” it), by virtue of its packaging. Ezra Pound in his ABC of
Reading wrote “DICHTEN=CONDENSARE” (New
Directions 1960 ed., 36). It is the condensed quality of this visual that makes
it poetic and allows it a poetic function in the poem.
A
good line in a poem plays upon the whole rest of the poem to make it all both
add up anew and reach out further. This visual was chosen to act like a line in
this poem because it has meditation in it to fit with the lines in words, and
it has dimensions that reach beyond into social domains the other lines don’t
quite reach.
If
you go back to the first poem in “Trouble in Mind,” a more complex version of
this takes place with the iconic elements there. We have Saint Patrick in
marble and a “No Camping” sign on a green open hill. The sign names County
Meath and helps the chance that this hill might be recognized as the Hill of
Tara, the ancient and almost mythical government seat of Ireland. With or
without that chance, the picture enters the poem and expands upon its theme of
a world where artsy concerns clash against the concerns of those who must make
a camp and often sleep on the sidewalks. I won’t belabor all that here, but
invite such close and open reading of all the pictures as something like a line
in the poem not given a temporal place among the others but a spatially logical
and emotionally ethical one.
"Get the Picture" #1
SPACE
(for
Tenzin Gyatso)
Between words an old-time printer put
not nothing but a piece of type
that would work with words by saying nothing;
ems, ens, mutton quads, and combinations
marked off words as they edged toward thought.
Thought will fill any space like water is said to;
its words go anywhere they are not held out of, and even
there.
Those little bits of type or today’s digital equals
show what thought is not that it could not do without
between the words that keep flowing in.
As the grasp of thought expands, always
some light or maybe some dark shows thru yet—
filling
in for the nothing we give no thought to.Useful Remainder
Along with that Mallarméan extension into "poème critique," I was thinking more practically of the Nordic terser tenser praxis in Tomas Tranströmer's way of showing associative thinking. In Baltics "VI," he actually writes of trying to remember what comes to mind ("det påminner om något / it reminds me of something") when he sees the old island graveyard and feels himself standing there ("jag var dår / I was there") as he had stood somewhere else. Then he sees it was Prague's Jewish cemetery ("ghettokyrkogård"). The new publication of Sam Charters' translation has photos by Ann Charters providing illustration. They show the island life of which he writes. However, if we had an insertion of a photo of Prague's ghettokyrkogård like the verbal version Tranströmer inserts, we might literally see how that image exceeds its use in the poem. The sufferings of the Baltic islanders and the concentrated culture of fishing/shipping/living on those islands is imaged in the crowded stones he sees, but the other stones he sees from Prague have further associations: it is what we might call a useful remainder.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)